Die Design Metal Stamping Miniature Precision Components Precision Balls Printed Circuit Boards

| Reference Notes on Die Design | Resource Information for Tool and Die | Tutorials and Technical Articles on Design Design Calculations | On-line Guide Book for Precision Metal Stamping |

Educational Resource on Die Design and Metal Stamping


» Suwa Precision Stamping Die Home

» Suwa Precision Group Manufacturer Profile

Precision Metal Stamping; Die Design
» Progressive Tool Carbide Tool Die
» Metal Stamping Tool Die Design
» Precision Metal Stamping
» Deep Drawn Metal Stamping
» High Speed Stamping


» Contact Us

Suwa Precision Press Release News, Announcements and Articles
Latest News:

» Nagano Sankoh Shortens Die Design using Latest Japanese CAE Metal Forming Software - 21/12/2005

Related Metal Forming Articles
» How To Make Lighter and Thinner Magnesium Components?

This section of the web site will contain reference notes, white papers and technical articles specific to die design and metal stamping die maintenance.

Most of the information will be drawn from Japanese textbooks on the subject such as Design of Press Progressive Die from Mr Yamaguchi Fumio, a die design consultant we are privileged to associate with, who has written many good books on the subject as well as the monthly industry magazines in Japan.

It is not planned to be a comprehensive guide but rather to contain some practical information which die designers, metal stamping toolmakers and students may find useful.

The framework for the key topics would be:

Tool Design

  • Basic Knowledge of Dies
  • Design and Tool Specifications
  • Standard Guidelines for Design
  • Materials for making Stamping Die and Press Tool: Tool Steels, Tungsten Carbide

Blanking Die Design

  • Shearing Deformation and Sheared Edge Study
  • Clearance between Punch and Die
  • Blanking Force Calculation
  • Stripper Force Calculation
  • Common Problems and Root Causes

Bending and Forming Die Design

  • Common Types of Bending
  • Key Factors in Bending
  • Bending Relief and Allowance Calculation
  • Methods of Bending
  • Dealing with Springback
  • Bending Force Calculation and Tutorial
  • Common Problems and Root Causes

Draw Forming and Draw Die Design

Die Design for Performance

  • Strip Layout
  • Component Design
  • Design for Maintenance

Tooling Enhancement for Performance


Sheet Metal Raw Material Specifications

  • Properties of Sheet Metal Raw Material
  • Understanding the effects of the sheet metal raw materials

Click on the pictures below for enlarged views.


Bending Force Calculation


V-Type and U-Type Bending without pressure pads below: Bending Force Calculation for V-Type and U-Type Unsupported Bends

V-Type Bending with V-shaped pressure pad below (coining): Bending Force Calculation for V-Type Bend Coining
U-Type Bending with pressure pad below:

Bending Force Calculation for U-Type Bend

L-Type Bending or 90 degree bending: Bending Force Calculation for L-Type Bends or 90 degree bends

Tutorial on Bending Force Calculation


Tutorial on V-Type Bending Force Calculation
Calculate the bending force required for the above forming:
First, calculate C1. From the L/C1 table in the reference notes above, as L=8t, then C1=1.33.
Accordingly, applying the numbers into the equation:
P1=C1* (B*t2*σB)/L = 1.33*(100*12*30)/8= 498.75
500 kg
Therefore, the required bending force is about 500 kgf.

>> Back to Articles Menu

Key Factors in Draw Forming

  • Raw Material Selections for Draw Applications:
    Choice and condition of the actual raw material to draw is important. In certain applications, such as deep draw, specially formulated material may be required. Besides the grain size and shape, the tolerance and composition of the raw material may affect the final part.
  • Determining the Correct Amount of Material:
    Blank development or the amount of raw material it will take to make the draw and carry the part. Too much material means excessive scrap and can prevent the tool from drawing properly.
  • Metal Reduction:
    Stock thickness is critical to the tool's ability to draw the metal. If the typical part require 3 draw operations to complete, but if the material has a low thickness to blank diameter ratio, another draw may be required.
  • Material Control:
    Raw material control is the method by which the part will be carried or transferred through the die. The determining factors are part geometry, material thickness, depth of draw, material consumption, burr direction, annealing, production rate, and ejection.
  • Tool Steel Selection:
    This can relate back to the actual raw material of the part.
  • Lubricants Selection:
    Lubricants must be compatible with the metal being formed, the tool itself as well as the environment.
>> Back to Articles Menu

Blank Size Calculation for Draw Forming or Draw Stamping


Most textbooks teach that there are 2 ways of determining the blank size for a draw stamped part. They are namely, algebraic method through centerline of stock using either the surface area or weight of the part, and the graphical method of calculating blank size. The example below shows how to find the blank size for a deep drawn can using the surface area algebraic method:



Most draw forming design and simulation softwares come with modules to calculate the blank based on the stamped part data automatically. If further examples of different drawn components and the equations for calculating the blank sizes are useful as tutorial questions and answers purpose, email us at sales@suwaprecision.com. These equations have been extracted from various sources.

>> Back to Articles Menu

Metal Reduction Rates


Draw forming a metal part is basically a series of reduction steps from the blank to the first draw, to the second draw, and so on. The reduction rate is calculated as follows:

Ri=100(1-di/di-1)

Ri: i-th reduction in percentage
di: Diameter of the part after the i-th draw reduction
d0: Diameter of the blank before the first draw reduction

As the actual draw forming of the same part would differ based on the different quality of the raw materials, tooling coatings and lubricants, most die design experts agree that the metal reduction rates available today merely serve as a guide based on past experience. During the assembly and troubleshooting of the draw die, the toolmaker will still need to make finer adjustments.

Blanks with equal surface dimensions but different metal thickness have different outcomes when subject to the same draw reduction rates. Thinner metal is more difficult to draw consistently when compared to thicker metal. It is recommended that metal thickness to blank diameter ratio (t/d) should be above 0.25.

Recommended maximum rates of reduction for round deep drawn parts are as follows:

Material Thickness

Blank-1st Draw (%)

1st-2nd Draw (%)

2nd-3rd Draw (%)

0.010

27

18

17

0.015

32

20

19

0.020

35

21

20

0.025

39

22

21

0.030

42

23

22

0.035

44

26

24

0.040

46

28

25

0.045

47

28

25

0.050

47

29

26

0.055

48

29

26

0.060-0.125

48

30

27

0.125-0.250

47

28

26


The general maximum cupping reduction rates for different metals are as follows:

Aluminum alloys               => 45%
Copper                            => 45%
Brass                               => 50%
Bronze, Tin                      => 50%
Low Carbon Steel            => 45%
Austenitic Stainless Steel => 50%
Zinc                                  => 40%

>> Back to Articles Menu


Component Design and Function



# Design of Blank Holder and Blank Holding Force


The design of the blank holder is important as it affects the rate of flow of the sheet metal during draw forming. The examples below shows the effect of insufficient blank holder force during the draw stamping of a can, causing either wrinkling of the flange or the side walls.





The punch and die clearances are arranged so that the metal is lightly drawn between them. This removes any creases which tend to form during the drawing operation. However, if we were to draw cup-shaped components with larger depth to diameter ratio from thinner metal, then puckering or wrinkling of the flange as shown above is likely to occur round the edge of the blank rim outside the die. This puckering is caused by the local thickening of material round the edge setting off hoop stress forces in the material.

This puckering may be sufficient to prevent the metal flowing smoothly through the die and the punch may tear the bottom out of the component. Even if the tensile strength of the metal allowed it to be forced through the die, it would be impossible to 'iron out' all the pucker marks.

The solution to this problem is to add a blank-holder to the deep draw tools. The blank-holder basically presses the blank rim material outside the die, and provides a tensile force opposing the compressive hoop stress within the blank rim. This allows the metal under the blank-holder to thicken uniformly around its annular rim and progressively between the die mouth and the outside of the blank.

When using double action presses that have mechanically operated blank holders, the setting of the blank-holder force is usually determined empirically. This is done by drawing the shell progressively deeper using blanks of the same diameter while progressively lowering the blank holder until the surface of the drawn shell is smooth and free from wrinkles. The pressure of the blank holder on the blank increase during the drawing operation as the edge thickness of the blank increases under the effect of the hoop compression forces set up.

In cases when it is not possible to exert sufficient force on the blank-holder to prevent wrinkling, or there may be problems with lubrication of the blank itself, the tool may be designed with an entry bead to the die.



The minimum blank holding force for the various stamping materials are listed below for your reference:
Mild Steel t<0.5mm ==> 0.25~0.30 kg/mm2
Mild Steel t>0.5mm ==> 0.20~0.25 kg/mm2
Aluminum                 ==> 0.03~0.07 kg/mm2
Copper                    ==> 0.08~0.14 kg/mm2
Brass                       ==> 0.11~0.21 kg/mm2
Stainless Steel (18-8) => 0.40~0.45 kg/mm2
Bronze                     ==> 0.20~0.25 kg/mm2
Aluminum Alloy        ==> 0.14~0.70 kg/mm2


>> Back to Articles Menu

Warm Metal Forming of Thin Walled Magnesium Components

Magnesium is the lightest structural material offering very good damping characteristics, weldability and excellent shielding against electro-magnetic interferance, and is unlimited in supply. It has been an excellent material for making portable electronic and telecommunication devices, and automotive and aerospace equipment such as MD player casings, chassis for cell phones, video cameras and notebook computers, automotive gear housings, car wheels and engine blocks.

The most common methods to produce magnesium parts are die casting and thixomolding processes. However, these runner and gating processes provide a low material yield of only 30% for thin-wall casting and can only produce thin walls of between 0.7mm to 1.2mm.

If we can form magnesium parts from sheet metal just like metal stamping of steel and aluminum parts, we can achieve better material yield of about 80% and possibly safer operation due to the lower processing temperature. However, magnesium is known to be non-formable as it is very resistant to deformation due to its hexagonal close-packed structure. The only way is warm forming of magnesium as deformation of magnesium above 225 degrees Celsius will cause additional slip planes to become operative.

Extensive process research in this area have resulted in a few warm forming hydraulic presses available in the market for draw forming. Recently, research in warm draw forming of magnesium to make cell phone chassis has successfully shown that 0.4mm thin walls can be achieved consistently. Metallographic tests of the chassis have also demonstrated that there is zero porosity and increased rigidity.

While the current warm forming press systems are complicated to operate as they require the preliminary building of stroke and force profiles for the specific products using data acquisition modules and forming simulation softwares, the increased replacement of aluminum and plastics with magnesium for handheld electronic devices may well accelerate this process. Progressive early adopters of this technology would have a first mover advantage in the competitive global manufacturing industry.

Author Ken Yap is a director of Suwa Precision Engineering Pte Ltd in Singapore and represents metal stamping, precision machining, miniature precision balls and PCB manufacturers from Suwa, also called "The Oriental Switzerland" in Japan due to its Swiss resemblance for rich watch-making industry, its mountainous terrain and its precision component making industry. He is also a director of Attisse Pte Ltd, a business consultancy and research consultancy firm for Japanese investors, and SV Tech Pte Ltd which is engaged in sourcing of PCB, IC chips and semiconductor related products from China.

>> Back to Articles Menu

Metal Forming Stamping
Progressive metal stamping die
Transfer Stamping Die Design

Suwa Precision - competitive supplier of precision metal stamping, tool and die, miniature precision metal components fabrication, miniature precision balls, printed circuit boards and custom semiconductor chips.